From: kfraser@dhcp93.uk.xensource.com Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:31:37 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Fix negation of unsigned quantities in the Xen x86 emulator. X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/4.8.0-1+rpi1~1^2~15972^2~49^2~37 X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/%22http://www.example.com/cgi/success//%22http:/www.example.com/cgi/success/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f7ec35430685595784788569e178793fe9067307;p=xen.git Fix negation of unsigned quantities in the Xen x86 emulator. This fixes the problems left behind by c/s 10171. Again pointed out by Jan Beulich; and again different from his suggested patch. Hopefully this one will be less embarrassing. Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser --- diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c index 32c69624e4..86bb175523 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c @@ -876,7 +876,7 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) PAGE_FAULT(regs->edi, USER_WRITE_FAULT); break; } - regs->edi += (regs->eflags & EF_DF) ? -(int)op_bytes : op_bytes; + regs->edi += (int)((regs->eflags & EF_DF) ? -op_bytes : op_bytes); break; case 0x6e: /* OUTSB */ @@ -902,7 +902,7 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) outl_user((u32)data, (u16)regs->edx, v, regs); break; } - regs->esi += (regs->eflags & EF_DF) ? -(int)op_bytes : op_bytes; + regs->esi += (int)((regs->eflags & EF_DF) ? -op_bytes : op_bytes); break; } diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate.c index 5bdafa9192..a33391f1a7 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate.c @@ -380,11 +380,12 @@ do{ __asm__ __volatile__ ( \ ((reg) & ((1UL << (ad_bytes << 3)) - 1)))) #define register_address_increment(reg, inc) \ do { \ + int _inc = (inc); /* signed type ensures sign extension to long */ \ if ( ad_bytes == sizeof(unsigned long) ) \ - (reg) += (inc); \ + (reg) += _inc; \ else \ (reg) = ((reg) & ~((1UL << (ad_bytes << 3)) - 1)) | \ - (((reg) + (inc)) & ((1UL << (ad_bytes << 3)) - 1)); \ + (((reg) + _inc) & ((1UL << (ad_bytes << 3)) - 1)); \ } while (0) void * @@ -858,7 +859,7 @@ x86_emulate_memop( &dst.val, 8, ctxt)) != 0 ) goto done; } - register_address_increment(_regs.esp, -(int)dst.bytes); + register_address_increment(_regs.esp, -dst.bytes); if ( (rc = ops->write_std(register_address(_regs.ss, _regs.esp), dst.val, dst.bytes, ctxt)) != 0 ) goto done; @@ -942,9 +943,9 @@ x86_emulate_memop( goto done; } register_address_increment( - _regs.esi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -(int)dst.bytes : dst.bytes); + _regs.esi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -dst.bytes : dst.bytes); register_address_increment( - _regs.edi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -(int)dst.bytes : dst.bytes); + _regs.edi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -dst.bytes : dst.bytes); break; case 0xa6 ... 0xa7: /* cmps */ DPRINTF("Urk! I don't handle CMPS.\n"); @@ -955,7 +956,7 @@ x86_emulate_memop( dst.ptr = (unsigned long *)cr2; dst.val = _regs.eax; register_address_increment( - _regs.edi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -(int)dst.bytes : dst.bytes); + _regs.edi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -dst.bytes : dst.bytes); break; case 0xac ... 0xad: /* lods */ dst.type = OP_REG; @@ -964,7 +965,7 @@ x86_emulate_memop( if ( (rc = ops->read_emulated(cr2, &dst.val, dst.bytes, ctxt)) != 0 ) goto done; register_address_increment( - _regs.esi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -(int)dst.bytes : dst.bytes); + _regs.esi, (_regs.eflags & EFLG_DF) ? -dst.bytes : dst.bytes); break; case 0xae ... 0xaf: /* scas */ DPRINTF("Urk! I don't handle SCAS.\n");